↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ and researchers’ experiences with a patient board for a clinical trial on urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients’ and researchers’ experiences with a patient board for a clinical trial on urinary tract infections
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-019-0172-0
Authors

Imke Schilling, Heike Behrens, Jutta Bleidorn, Ildikó Gágyor, Claudia Hugenschmidt, Hannah Jilani, Guido Schmiemann, Ansgar Gerhardus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,968,739
of 16,415,623 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#194
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,136
of 390,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#30
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,415,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.