You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Eurythmy therapy in chronic disease: a four-year prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-7-61 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Harald J Hamre, Claudia M Witt, Anja Glockmann, Renatus Ziegler, Stefan N Willich, Helmut Kiene |
Abstract |
Many patients with chronic diseases use complementary therapies, often provided by their physicians. In Germany, several physician-provided complementary therapies have been reimbursed by health insurance companies as part of health benefit programs. In most of these therapies, the patient has a predominantly passive role. In eurythmy therapy, however, patients actively exercise specific movements with the hands, the feet or the whole body. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in patients practising eurythmy therapy exercises for chronic diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 18% |
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,747,785
of 24,649,404 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,219
of 16,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,368
of 78,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,649,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.