You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José M. Cisneros, Clara María Rosso-Fernández, Cristina Roca-Oporto, Gennaro De Pascale, Silvia Jiménez-Jorge, Esteban Fernández-Hinojosa, Dimitrios K. Matthaiou, Paula Ramírez, Ramón Ortiz Díaz-Miguel, Angel Estella, Massimo Antonelli, George Dimopoulos, José Garnacho-Montero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,136,525
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,895
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,910
of 473,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.