↓ Skip to main content

Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
921 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1386 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon D French, Sally E Green, Denise A O’Connor, Joanne E McKenzie, Jill J Francis, Susan Michie, Rachelle Buchbinder, Peter Schattner, Neil Spike, Jeremy M Grimshaw

Abstract

There is little systematic operational guidance about how best to develop complex interventions to reduce the gap between practice and evidence. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting the development and use of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to advance the science of implementation research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 17 1%
Canada 7 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Ghana 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1341 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 246 18%
Student > Master 223 16%
Researcher 216 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 6%
Student > Bachelor 79 6%
Other 282 20%
Unknown 255 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 308 22%
Psychology 202 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 171 12%
Social Sciences 138 10%
Sports and Recreations 32 2%
Other 218 16%
Unknown 317 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#723,795
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#72
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,377
of 177,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.