↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1239-6
Authors

Brice Batomen, Lynne Moore, Mabel Carabali, Pier-Alexandre Tardif, Howard Champion, Arijit Nandi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 13%
Engineering 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,039,342
of 16,294,946 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#704
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,397
of 386,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#130
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,294,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.