You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1239-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brice Batomen, Lynne Moore, Mabel Carabali, Pier-Alexandre Tardif, Howard Champion, Arijit Nandi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Librarian | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,853,020
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#995
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,959
of 459,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#36
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.