↓ Skip to main content

A newly noninvasive model for prediction of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: utility of serum prolactin levels

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A newly noninvasive model for prediction of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: utility of serum prolactin levels
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12876-019-1120-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengzi Zhang, Wenhuan Feng, Xuehui Chu, Xitai Sun, Dalong Zhu, Yan Bi

Abstract

To investigate the value of prolactin (PRL) in diagnosing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Metabolic parameters and serum PRL levels were measured in 452 males and 421 females, who were randomized to the estimation or the validation group as a 1:1 ratio. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed via abdominal ultrasound. Variables that significantly associated with NAFLD in univariate analysis were included in multiple logistic regression. We used the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves to test the model performance. Besides, 147 patients underwent metabolic and liver biopsy were analyzed to validate the diagnostic value of this model. Body mass index, alanine aminotransferase, prolactin, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and HbA1c were included into models. In males, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.82-0.91) for the validation group. With two cut-off points (- 0.79 and 1.71), the sensitivity and specificity for predicting NALFD was 95.2 and 91.1% in the validation group, respectively. In females, the AUC was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.76-0.88) for the validation group. With two cut-off points (- 0.68 and 2.16), the sensitivity and specificity for predicting NALFD was 97.1 and 91.4% in the validation group, respectively. In subjects with liver pathology, the AUC was higher than that of fatty liver index. A positive correlation between the scores of the model and the severities of NAFLD was observed. Importantly, we demonstrated a potential value of this model in predicting nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. We established a mathematic model that can conveniently and effectively diagnose the existence and severities of NAFLD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,590,077
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#853
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,276
of 459,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.