You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and content validity of a patient reported outcomes measure to assess symptoms of major depressive disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-12-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Eilene Lasch, Mariam Hassan, Jean Endicott, Elisabeth Carine Piault-Luis, Julie Locklear, Marcy Fitz-Randolph, Sanjeev Pathak, Steve Hwang, Kasey Jernigan |
| Abstract |
Although many symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are assessed through patient-report, there are currently no patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that incorporate documented evidence of patient input in PRO instrument development. A review of existing PROs used in MDD suggested the need to conduct qualitative research with patients with MDD to better understand their experience of MDD and develop an evaluative instrument with content validity. The aim of this study was to develop a disease-specific questionnaire to assess symptoms important and relevant to adult MDD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 102 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,587
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,059
of 176,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#34
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.