↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of functional assay evidence use by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of functional assay evidence use by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13073-019-0683-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dona M. Kanavy, Shannon M. McNulty, Meera K. Jairath, Sarah E. Brnich, Chris Bizon, Bradford C. Powell, Jonathan S. Berg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Unspecified 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,059,047
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,206
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,480
of 458,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#31
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.