↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: The hospital of the future - building intelligent environments to facilitate safe and effective acute care delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: The hospital of the future - building intelligent environments to facilitate safe and effective acute care delivery
Published in
Critical Care, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian W Pickering, John M Litell, Vitaly Herasevich, Ognjen Gajic

Abstract

The translation of knowledge into rational care is as essential and pressing a task as the development of new diagnostic or therapeutic devices, and is arguably more important. The emerging science of health care delivery has identified the central role of human factor ergonomics in the prevention of medical error, omission, and waste. Novel informatics and systems engineering strategies provide an excellent opportunity to improve the design of acute care delivery. In this article, future hospitals are envisioned as organizations built around smart environments that facilitate consistent delivery of effective, equitable, and error-free care focused on patient-centered rather than provider-centered outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Brazil 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 20 16%
Other 11 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Engineering 12 10%
Computer Science 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 15 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,441,625
of 18,708,482 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,016
of 5,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,639
of 135,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,708,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.