You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical review: The hospital of the future - building intelligent environments to facilitate safe and effective acute care delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian W Pickering, John M Litell, Vitaly Herasevich, Ognjen Gajic |
| Abstract |
The translation of knowledge into rational care is as essential and pressing a task as the development of new diagnostic or therapeutic devices, and is arguably more important. The emerging science of health care delivery has identified the central role of human factor ergonomics in the prevention of medical error, omission, and waste. Novel informatics and systems engineering strategies provide an excellent opportunity to improve the design of acute care delivery. In this article, future hospitals are envisioned as organizations built around smart environments that facilitate consistent delivery of effective, equitable, and error-free care focused on patient-centered rather than provider-centered outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 39% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Engineering | 13 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,614,227
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,796
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,942
of 175,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.