You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Access, use and perceptions regarding Internet, cell phones and PDAs as a means for health promotion for people living with HIV in Peru
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-7-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter H Curioso, Ann E Kurth |
| Abstract |
Internet tools, cell phones, and other information and communication technologies are being used by HIV-positive people on their own initiative. Little is known about the perceptions of HIV-positive people towards these technologies in Peru. The purpose of this paper is to report on perceptions towards use of information and communication technologies as a means to support antiretroviral medication adherence and HIV transmission risk reduction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 40% |
| Peru | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,416,807
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#455
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,629
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.