↓ Skip to main content

Mediation of Drosophilaautosomal dosage effects and compensation by network interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mediation of Drosophilaautosomal dosage effects and compensation by network interactions
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r28
Pubmed ID
Authors

John H Malone, Dong-Yeon Cho, Nicolas R Mattiuzzo, Carlo G Artieri, Lichun Jiang, Ryan K Dale, Harold E Smith, Jennifer McDaniel, Sarah Munro, Marc Salit, Justen Andrews, Teresa M Przytycka, Brian Oliver

Abstract

Gene dosage change is a mild perturbation that is a valuable tool for pathway reconstruction in Drosophila. While it is often assumed that reducing gene dose by half leads to two-fold less expression, there is partial autosomal dosage compensation in Drosophila, which may be mediated by feedback or buffering in expression networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 25%
Computer Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,055
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,713
of 175,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.