You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mediation of Drosophilaautosomal dosage effects and compensation by network interactions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John H Malone, Dong-Yeon Cho, Nicolas R Mattiuzzo, Carlo G Artieri, Lichun Jiang, Ryan K Dale, Harold E Smith, Jennifer McDaniel, Sarah Munro, Marc Salit, Justen Andrews, Teresa M Przytycka, Brian Oliver |
Abstract |
Gene dosage change is a mild perturbation that is a valuable tool for pathway reconstruction in Drosophila. While it is often assumed that reducing gene dose by half leads to two-fold less expression, there is partial autosomal dosage compensation in Drosophila, which may be mediated by feedback or buffering in expression networks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 25% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,055
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,713
of 175,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.