You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic fatigue syndrome: Harvey and Wessely's (bio)psychosocial model versus a bio(psychosocial) model based on inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-8-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Maes, Frank NM Twisk |
| Abstract |
In a recently published paper, Harvey and Wessely put forward a 'biopsychosocial' explanatory model for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), which is proposed to be applicable to (chronic) fatigue even when apparent medical causes are present. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 35% |
| Psychology | 28 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,486,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,041
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,792
of 106,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.