You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0081-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamarinde L. Haven, Joeri K. Tijdink, H. Roeline Pasman, Guy Widdershoven, Gerben ter Riet, Lex M. Bouter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 32% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,415,727
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#65
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,856
of 471,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.