You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assesment and interpretation of negative forelimb allometry in the evolution of non-avian Theropoda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Zoology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12983-019-0342-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José A. Palma Liberona, Sergio Soto-Acuña, Marco A. Mendez, Alexander O. Vargas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,448,744
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#146
of 696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,923
of 473,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.