↓ Skip to main content

Patients with Fibromyalgia Display Less Functional Connectivity in the Brain's Pain Inhibitory Network

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with Fibromyalgia Display Less Functional Connectivity in the Brain's Pain Inhibitory Network
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-8-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin B Jensen, Rita Loitoile, Eva Kosek, Frank Petzke, Serena Carville, Peter Fransson, Hanke Marcus, Steven CR Williams, Ernest Choy, Yves Mainguy, Olivier Vitton, Richard H Gracely, Randy Gollub, Martin Ingvar, Jian Kong

Abstract

There is evidence for augmented processing of pain and impaired endogenous pain inhibition in Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM). In order to fully understand the mechanisms involved in FM pathology, there is a need for closer investigation of endogenous pain modulation. In the present study, we compared the functional connectivity of the descending pain inhibitory network in age-matched FM patients and healthy controls (HC).We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 42 subjects; 14 healthy and 28 age-matched FM patients (2 patients per HC), during randomly presented, subjectively calibrated pressure pain stimuli. A seed-based functional connectivity analysis of brain activity was performed. The seed coordinates were based on the findings from our previous study, comparing the fMRI signal during calibrated pressure pain in FM and HC: the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and thalamus.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 250 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 20%
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 29%
Neuroscience 42 16%
Psychology 40 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 43 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,945,332
of 20,162,811 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#133
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,805
of 139,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,162,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them