↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0871-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Francisco Meneses-Echavez, Indira Rodriguez-Prieto, Mark Elkins, Javier Martínez-Torres, Lien Nguyen, Julia Bidonde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,742,916
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#432
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,719
of 459,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.