You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anusoumya Ganapathy, Neill KJ Adhikari, Jamie Spiegelman, Damon C Scales |
| Abstract |
Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 19% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 38 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,807,943
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,270
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,789
of 175,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.