↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LA paroscopy and/or FA st track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LA paroscopy and/or FA st track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial)
Published in
BMC Surgery, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-6-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Wind, Jan Hofland, Benedikt Preckel, Markus W Hollmann, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Dirk J Gouma, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Jan Willem Fuhring, Cornelis HC Dejong, Ronald M van Dam, Miguel A Cuesta, Astrid Noordhuis, Dick de Jong, Edith van Zalingen, Alexander F Engel, T Hauwy Goei, I Erica de Stoppelaar, Willem F van Tets, Bart A van Wagensveld, Annemiek Swart, Maarten JLJ van den Elsen, Michael F Gerhards, Laurens Th de Wit, Muriel AM Siepel, Anna AW van Geloven, Jan-Willem Juttmann, Wilfred Clevers, Willem A Bemelman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Czechia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Other 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 31 32%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,601,692
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#156
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,939
of 156,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.