You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss of genetic diversity as a signature of apricot domestication and diffusion into the Mediterranean Basin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-12-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hedia Bourguiba, Jean-Marc Audergon, Lamia Krichen, Neila Trifi-Farah, Ali Mamouni, Samia Trabelsi, Claudio D’Onofrio, Bayram M Asma, Sylvain Santoni, Bouchaib Khadari |
| Abstract |
Domestication generally implies a loss of diversity in crop species relative to their wild ancestors because of genetic drift through bottleneck effects. Compared to native Mediterranean fruit species like olive and grape, the loss of genetic diversity is expected to be more substantial for fruit species introduced into Mediterranean areas such as apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), which was probably primarily domesticated in China. By comparing genetic diversity among regional apricot gene pools in several Mediterranean areas, we investigated the loss of genetic diversity associated with apricot selection and diffusion into the Mediterranean Basin. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2012.
All research outputs
#2,911,262
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#153
of 3,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,098
of 161,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.