↓ Skip to main content

Genetic determinants of metabolism in health and disease: from biochemical genetics to genome-wide associations

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic determinants of metabolism in health and disease: from biochemical genetics to genome-wide associations
Published in
Genome Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/gm329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven L Robinette, Elaine Holmes, Jeremy K Nicholson, Marc E Dumas

Abstract

Increasingly sophisticated measurement technologies have allowed the fields of metabolomics and genomics to identify, in parallel, risk factors of disease; predict drug metabolism; and study metabolic and genetic diversity in large human populations. Yet the complementarity of these fields and the utility of studying genes and metabolites together is belied by the frequent separate, parallel applications of genomic and metabolomic analysis. Early attempts at identifying co-variation and interaction between genetic variants and downstream metabolic changes, including metabolic profiling of human Mendelian diseases and quantitative trait locus mapping of individual metabolite concentrations, have recently been extended by new experimental designs that search for a large number of gene-metabolite associations. These approaches, including metabolomic quantitiative trait locus mapping and metabolomic genome-wide association studies, involve the concurrent collection of both genomic and metabolomic data and a subsequent search for statistical associations between genetic polymorphisms and metabolite concentrations across a broad range of genes and metabolites. These new data-fusion techniques will have important consequences in functional genomics, microbial metagenomics and disease modeling, the early results and implications of which are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 88 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 2 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Chemistry 6 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 7 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,370
of 1,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,799
of 175,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.