You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘All the stars were aligned’? The origins of England’s National Institute for Health Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0491-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Atkinson, Sally Sheard, Tom Walley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 44% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 50% |
| Scientists | 15 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,108,516
of 24,067,703 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#101
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,506
of 465,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,067,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.