↓ Skip to main content

Use of V(D)J recombination excision circles to identify T- and B-cell defects and to monitor the treatment in primary and acquired immunodeficiencies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of V(D)J recombination excision circles to identify T- and B-cell defects and to monitor the treatment in primary and acquired immunodeficiencies
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Serana, Marco Chiarini, Cinzia Zanotti, Alessandra Sottini, Diego Bertoli, Andrea Bosio, Luigi Caimi, Luisa Imberti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 10%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,976,465
of 16,339,421 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,448
of 3,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,056
of 386,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#183
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,339,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.