↓ Skip to main content

The impact of basic vs. enhanced Go NAPSACC on child care centers’ healthy eating and physical activity practices: protocol for a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of basic vs. enhanced Go NAPSACC on child care centers’ healthy eating and physical activity practices: protocol for a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized trial
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0949-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber E. Vaughn, Christina R. Studts, Byron J. Powell, Alice S. Ammerman, Justin G. Trogdon, Geoffrey M. Curran, Derek Hales, Erik Willis, Dianne S. Ward

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 20%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 35 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 36 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,350,247
of 18,934,527 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#612
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,208
of 412,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#61
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,934,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.