You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inulin-type fructans supplementation improves glycemic control for the prediabetes and type 2 diabetes populations: results from a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-02159-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Long Wang, Hong Yang, Hao Huang, Chao Zhang, Hong-Xia Zuo, Pan Xu, Yu-Ming Niu, Shi-Shi Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#603,807
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#123
of 4,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,038
of 465,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.