↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive diagnosis of viability in seeds and lichens by infrared thermography under controlled environmental conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-invasive diagnosis of viability in seeds and lichens by infrared thermography under controlled environmental conditions
Published in
Plant Methods, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0531-8
Authors

Beatriz Fernández-Marín, Othmar Buchner, Gerald Kastberger, Federica Piombino, José Ignacio García-Plazaola, Ilse Kranner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,979,730
of 16,343,617 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#703
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,512
of 385,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#133
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,343,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.