↓ Skip to main content

Regulating digital health technologies with transparency: the case for dynamic and multi-stakeholder evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulating digital health technologies with transparency: the case for dynamic and multi-stakeholder evaluation
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1447-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Rodriguez-Villa, John Torous

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 48 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Computer Science 11 9%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 50 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#929,459
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#651
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,642
of 461,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#15
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.