↓ Skip to main content

Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcomes-based integrated medical program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcomes-based integrated medical program
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen A Scicluna, Michael C Grimm, Anthony J O’Sullivan, Peter Harris, Louis S Pilotto, Philip D Jones, H Patrick McNeil

Abstract

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) Faculty of Medicine replaced its old content-based curriculum with an innovative new 6-year undergraduate entry outcomes-based integrated program in 2004. This paper is an initial evaluation of the perceived and assessed clinical capabilities of recent graduates of the new outcomes-based integrated medical program compared to benchmarks from traditional content-based or process-based programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 22%
Researcher 13 10%
Unspecified 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 34%
Social Sciences 27 22%
Unspecified 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,252
of 3,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,831
of 167,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.