You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcomes-based integrated medical program
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen A Scicluna, Michael C Grimm, Anthony J O’Sullivan, Peter Harris, Louis S Pilotto, Philip D Jones, H Patrick McNeil |
Abstract |
The University of New South Wales (UNSW) Faculty of Medicine replaced its old content-based curriculum with an innovative new 6-year undergraduate entry outcomes-based integrated program in 2004. This paper is an initial evaluation of the perceived and assessed clinical capabilities of recent graduates of the new outcomes-based integrated medical program compared to benchmarks from traditional content-based or process-based programs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 22% |
Researcher | 13 | 10% |
Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 26% |
Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 22% |
Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,252
of 3,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,831
of 167,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.