↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of blood flow in the fetus with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating: validation against metric optimized gating

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of blood flow in the fetus with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using Doppler ultrasound gating: validation against metric optimized gating
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12968-019-0586-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Ryd, Liqun Sun, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Sebastian Bidhult, Fabian Kording, Christian Ruprecht, Christopher K. Macgowan, Michael Seed, Anthony H. Aletras, Håkan Arheden, Erik Hedström

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Engineering 7 15%
Psychology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,695,670
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#891
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,995
of 477,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.