↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the performance of different approaches for functional and taxonomic annotation of metagenomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the performance of different approaches for functional and taxonomic annotation of metagenomes
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12864-019-6289-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Tamames, Marta Cobo-Simón, Fernando Puente-Sánchez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 23%
Environmental Science 15 8%
Computer Science 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 43 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#942,846
of 22,458,746 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#150
of 10,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,251
of 437,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#14
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,458,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.