↓ Skip to main content

High-performance web services for querying gene and variant annotation

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
44 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-performance web services for querying gene and variant annotation
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0953-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiwen Xin, Adam Mark, Cyrus Afrasiabi, Ginger Tsueng, Moritz Juchler, Nikhil Gopal, Gregory S. Stupp, Timothy E. Putman, Benjamin J. Ainscough, Obi L. Griffith, Ali Torkamani, Patricia L. Whetzel, Christopher J. Mungall, Sean D. Mooney, Andrew I. Su, Chunlei Wu

Abstract

Efficient tools for data management and integration are essential for many aspects of high-throughput biology. In particular, annotations of genes and human genetic variants are commonly used but highly fragmented across many resources. Here, we describe MyGene.info and MyVariant.info, high-performance web services for querying gene and variant annotation information. These web services are currently accessed more than three million times permonth. They also demonstrate a generalizable cloud-based model for organizing and querying biological annotation information. MyGene.info and MyVariant.info are provided as high-performance web services, accessible at http://mygene.info and http://myvariant.info . Both are offered free of charge to the research community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 3 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Other 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 25%
Computer Science 27 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#414,498
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#219
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,542
of 312,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#6
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.