↓ Skip to main content

Plasma sTNFR1 and IL8 for prognostic enrichment in sepsis trials: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma sTNFR1 and IL8 for prognostic enrichment in sepsis trials: a prospective cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2684-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Anderson, Carolyn S. Calfee, Kathleen D. Liu, John P. Reilly, Kirsten N. Kangelaris, Michael G. S. Shashaty, Aili L. Lazaar, Andrew I. Bayliffe, Robert J. Gallop, Todd A. Miano, Thomas G. Dunn, Erik Johansson, Jason Abbott, Alejandra Jauregui, Thomas Deiss, Kathryn Vessel, Annika Belzer, Hanjing Zhuo, Michael A. Matthay, Nuala J. Meyer, Jason D. Christie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 49%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,191,899
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,292
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,456
of 473,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.