↓ Skip to main content

Mutation in MPT64 gene influencing diagnostic accuracy of SD Bioline assay (capilia)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutation in MPT64 gene influencing diagnostic accuracy of SD Bioline assay (capilia)
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4671-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamal Singh, Richa Kumari, Rajneesh Tripathi, Ankush Gupta, Shampa Anupurba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,063,168
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,167
of 7,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,160
of 459,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#84
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.