↓ Skip to main content

Presentation and outcome of Middle East respiratory syndrome in Saudi intensive care unit patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presentation and outcome of Middle East respiratory syndrome in Saudi intensive care unit patients
Published in
Critical Care, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1303-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghaleb A. Almekhlafi, Mohammed M. Albarrak, Yasser Mandourah, Sahar Hassan, Abid Alwan, Abdullah Abudayah, Sultan Altayyar, Mohamed Mustafa, Tareef Aldaghestani, Adnan Alghamedi, Ali Talag, Muhammad K. Malik, Ali S. Omrani, Yasser Sakr

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection is associated with high mortality rates but limited clinical data have been reported. We describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. Retrospective analysis of data from all adult (>18 years old) patients admitted to our 20-bed mixed ICU with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection between October 1, 2012 and May 31, 2014. Diagnosis was confirmed in all patients using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction on respiratory samples. During the observation period, 31 patients were admitted with MERS-CoV infection (mean age 59 ± 20 years, 22 [71 %] males). Cough and tachypnea were reported in all patients; 22 (77.4 %) patients had bilateral pulmonary infiltrates. Invasive mechanical ventilation was applied in 27 (87.1 %) and vasopressor therapy in 25 (80.6 %) patients during the intensive care unit stay. Twenty-three (74.2 %) patients died in the ICU. Nonsurvivors were older, had greater APACHE II and SOFA scores on admission, and were more likely to have received invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy. After adjustment for the severity of illness and the degree of organ dysfunction, the need for vasopressors was an independent risk factor for death in the ICU (odds ratio = 18.33, 95 % confidence interval: 1.11-302.1, P = 0.04). MERS-CoV infection requiring admission to the ICU is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The need for vasopressor therapy is the main risk factor for death in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,127,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,949
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,843
of 312,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#82
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.