↓ Skip to main content

Identifying indigenous practices for cultivation of wild saprophytic mushrooms: responding to the need for sustainable utilization of natural resources

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying indigenous practices for cultivation of wild saprophytic mushrooms: responding to the need for sustainable utilization of natural resources
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13002-019-0342-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Wendiro, Alex Paul Wacoo, Graham Wise

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Master 16 7%
Lecturer 14 6%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 94 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 13%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Engineering 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 102 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,951,295
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#92
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,835
of 460,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.