↓ Skip to main content

PAD4 is not essential for disease in the K/BxN murine autoantibody-mediated model of arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PAD4 is not essential for disease in the K/BxN murine autoantibody-mediated model of arthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/ar3829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda S Rohrbach, Saskia Hemmers, Sanja Arandjelovic, Maripat Corr, Kerri A Mowen

Abstract

Both murine and human genome-wide association studies have implicated peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD4) as a susceptibility gene in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition, patients with RA commonly have autoantibodies which recognize PAD4 or and/or citrullinated peptides. This study aims to evaluate the role of PAD4 in the effector phase of arthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,337
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,056
of 175,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#42
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.