You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients attenuates muscle atrophy, neurophysiological disorders, and weakness: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0417-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulo Eugênio Silva, Rita de Cássia Marqueti, Karina Livino-de-Carvalho, Amaro Eduardo Tavares de Araujo, Joana Castro, Vinicius Maldaner da Silva, Luciana Vieira, Vinicius Carolino Souza, Lucas Ogura Dantas, Gerson Cipriano Jr, Otávio Tolêdo Nóbrega, Nicolas Babault, Joao Luiz Quagliotti Durigan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 79 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 87 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,712,249
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#85
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,956
of 479,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.