↓ Skip to main content

X-ray microtomography and linear discriminant analysis enable detection of embolism-related acoustic emissions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
X-ray microtomography and linear discriminant analysis enable detection of embolism-related acoustic emissions
Published in
Plant Methods, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0543-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels J. F. De Baerdemaeker, Michiel Stock, Jan Van den Bulcke, Bernard De Baets, Luc Van Hoorebeke, Kathy Steppe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Other 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,064,058
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#790
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,748
of 430,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#23
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.