You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Novel nanomedicine with a chemical-exchange saturation transfer effect for breast cancer treatment in vivo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0557-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanlong Jia, Chaochao Wang, Jiehua Zheng, Guisen Lin, Dalong Ni, Zhiwei Shen, Baoxuan Huang, Yan Li, Jitian Guan, Weida Hong, Yuanfeng Chen, Renhua Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,595,624
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1,268
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,756
of 430,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.