↓ Skip to main content

When patient advocacy organizations meet industry: a novel approach to dealing with financial conflicts of interest

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When patient advocacy organizations meet industry: a novel approach to dealing with financial conflicts of interest
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0435-1
Authors

Orna Ehrlich, Laura Wingate, Caren Heller, Inmaculada de Melo-Martin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,156,696
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#425
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,370
of 430,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.