You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13058-019-1221-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Giardiello, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Michael Hauptmann, Muriel A. Adank, Delal Akdeniz, Carl Blomqvist, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Mariël Brinkhuis, Jenny Chang-Claude, Kamila Czene, Peter Devilee, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton, Diana M. Eccles, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Montserrat García-Closas, Lothar Haeberle, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, John L. Hopper, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Audrey Jung, Renske Keeman, Iris Kramer, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Jan Lubiński, Mehdi Manoochehri, Luigi Mariani, Heli Nevanlinna, Hester S. A. Oldenburg, Saskia Pelders, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Mitul Shah, Sabine Siesling, Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit, Melissa C. Southey, William J. Tapper, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Alexandra J. van den Broek, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Chantal van Ongeval, Laura J. Van’t Veer, Qin Wang, Camilla Wendt, Pieter J. Westenend, Maartje J. Hooning, Marjanka K. Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,918
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#401,656
of 470,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.