You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Urology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hassan Soleimanpour, Kamaleddin Hassanzadeh, Hassan Vaezi, Samad EJ Golzari, Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani, Maryam Soleimanpour |
| Abstract |
Despite the fact that numerous medications have been introduced to treat renal colic, none has been proven to relieve the pain rapidly and thoroughly. In this study, we aimed at comparing the effects of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine in patients suffering from renal colic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 37% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#662,956
of 24,573,729 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#9
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,174
of 167,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,573,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them