↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 590)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department
Published in
BMC Urology, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2490-12-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hassan Soleimanpour, Kamaleddin Hassanzadeh, Hassan Vaezi, Samad EJ Golzari, Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani, Maryam Soleimanpour

Abstract

Despite the fact that numerous medications have been introduced to treat renal colic, none has been proven to relieve the pain rapidly and thoroughly. In this study, we aimed at comparing the effects of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine in patients suffering from renal colic.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#462,765
of 19,513,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#6
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,248
of 138,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,513,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them