↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the implementation of the PACE Steps to Success Programme in long-term care facilities in seven countries according to the RE-AIM framework

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the implementation of the PACE Steps to Success Programme in long-term care facilities in seven countries according to the RE-AIM framework
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0953-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Maud ten Koppel, Hein van Hout, Tinne Smets, Lara Pivodic, Marc Tanghe, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Jo Hockley, Sheila Payne, Danni Collingridge Moore, Violetta Kijowska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Marika Kylänen, Suvi Leppäaho, Claudia Mercuri, Paola Rossi, Martina Mercuri, Giovanni Gambassi, Catherine Bassal, Emilie Morgan de Paula, Yvonne Engels, Luc Deliens, Lieve Van den Block, H. Roeline Pasman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 29 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,940,765
of 20,455,010 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#491
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,011
of 417,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#46
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,455,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.