↓ Skip to main content

Insect repellent plants traditional usage practices in the Ethiopian malaria epidemic-prone setting: an ethnobotanical survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insect repellent plants traditional usage practices in the Ethiopian malaria epidemic-prone setting: an ethnobotanical survey
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-10-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaliyaperumal Karunamoorthi, Teklu Hailu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,592,673
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#520
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,127
of 315,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.