↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF system performances in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF system performances in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4687-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youness Mechal, Elmostafa Benaissa, Nadia El mrimar, Yassine Benlahlou, Fatna Bssaibis, Adil Zegmout, Mariama Chadli, Yashpal S. Malik, Nadia Touil, Ahmed Abid, Adil Maleb, Mostafa Elouennass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 73 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 77 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,404,679
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,812
of 7,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,548
of 458,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#68
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.