You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of plant-based repellents against different Anopheles species: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-3064-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amin Asadollahi, Mehdi Khoobdel, Alireza Zahraei-Ramazani, Sahar Azarmi, Sayed Hussain Mosawi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 166 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 175 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 330. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#101,971
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#7
of 5,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,212
of 480,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.