You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of New Zealand blueberry consumption on recovery from eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanita McLeay, Matthew J Barnes, Toby Mundel, Suzanne M Hurst, Roger D Hurst, Stephen R Stannard |
Abstract |
Exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) is accompanied by localized oxidative stress / inflammation which, in the short-term at least, is associated with impaired muscular performance. Dietary antioxidants have been shown to reduce excessive oxidative stress; however, their effectiveness in facilitating recovery following EIMD is not clear. Blueberries demonstrate antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. In this study we examine the effect of New Zealand blueberries on EIMD after strenuous eccentric exercise. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 20% |
Australia | 12 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
Japan | 9 | 7% |
Netherlands | 5 | 4% |
Brazil | 5 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 54 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 97 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 17% |
Scientists | 10 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 20% |
Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
Researcher | 19 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
Other | 48 | 18% |
Unknown | 67 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 69 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 9% |
Unknown | 78 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 414. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#71,731
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#39
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,304
of 448,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#38
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.