You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison framework and guideline of clustering methods for mass cytometry data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-019-1917-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao Liu, Weichen Song, Brandon Y. Wong, Ting Zhang, Shunying Yu, Guan Ning Lin, Xianting Ding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Sweden | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 24 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,280,178
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,020
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,970
of 474,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#83
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.