↓ Skip to main content

Developing public health ethics learning modules – can we learn from critical pedagogy?

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing public health ethics learning modules – can we learn from critical pedagogy?
Published in
Public Health Reviews, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40985-015-0006-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jutta Lindert, Christopher Potter

Abstract

Curriculum development in masters of public health programs that effectively meets the complex ethical challenges of the 21st century is an important part of public health education and requires ethical reasoning and purposively thinking. Current master programs in Public Health do not regularly include modules in public health ethics. The aim of this paper is to present background and theoretical foundation for developing a methodology and methods to develop public health ethics modules for curriculum development in public health programs. We describe ethical reasoning in medicine and in Public Health, specify pedagogical approaches and key assignments organized around the critical pedagogy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 54%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Chemistry 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#10,916,832
of 13,731,351 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#134
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,520
of 262,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,731,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them