↓ Skip to main content

Dose response effects of a caffeine-containing energy drink on muscle performance: a repeated measures design

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dose response effects of a caffeine-containing energy drink on muscle performance: a repeated measures design
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-9-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Del Coso, Juan José Salinero, Cristina González-Millán, Javier Abián-Vicén, Benito Pérez-González

Abstract

Energy drinks have become the most used caffeine-containing beverages in the sport setting. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two doses of a caffeine-containing energy drink on muscle performance during upper- and lower-body power-load tests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 27%
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 94 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 57 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#667,783
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#192
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,255
of 434,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#182
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.