↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant vitamin C for sepsis: mono or triple?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant vitamin C for sepsis: mono or triple?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2717-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelique M. E. Spoelstra–de Man, Heleen M. Oudemans–van Straaten, Mette M. Berger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Other 7 14%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,588,482
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,779
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,790
of 474,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.